As I watch the graduates parading proudly around my Brooklyn  neighborhood, I’ve been thinking a lot about how we handle high-school  education in this country. When I attended high school in suburban  Maryland, engineering wasn’t considered a subject. We had English, all  the sciences, math, music, social studies, even home ec, but engineering  was absent. And no, this isn’t one of those “my how times have changed  since I was young” stories. Things haven’t changed, at least by much;  and that’s not good, given the challenges that lie ahead.
My thoughts are inspired in part by the DiscoverE Summit, sponsored  by ASME, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, the National  Engineers Week Foundation, and DISCOVER magazine. Back in February I had  the pleasure of joining three outstanding K-12 educators from across  the country—Javaris Powell, Shella Condino, and Derek Sale—as they were  celebrated for their commitment to STEM education (science, technology,  engineering, math) and for the extraordinary impact they’ve had on their  students.
Javaris, Derek, and Shella all teach in underserved communities. But  lack of money and supplies isn’t their most troubling problem. Javaris  told me that the most difficult part of his job is breaking through his  students’ own stereotypes:
Derek teaches in Detroit, in one of the  poorest educational districts in Michigan. Every teacher loves  witnessing a good Eureka moment—when all the pieces fall into place and a  student suddenly gains a clearer understanding of how the world works.  For Derek’s students, that Aha! moment initially may be very immediate,  but he helps them look deeper:
Obviously not everyone will grow up to be engineers. Nevertheless,  Shella tries to expose all of her students to engineering  principles–even those she knows will end up pursuing other paths. Here’s  why:
So the DiscoverE Summit left me with mixed emotions, both encouraged  and frustrated. I wish things had changed more since I was wrestling  with beakers at Walt Whitman High School. Sure, there has been progress:  Engineering is making inroads into K-12 education and is finally on  many students’ radar. But it’s not nearly enough. From the tiny  molecular machines to the far reaches of space, humans love to explore,  to learn, to solve, and to build. That impulse offers great reason for  optimism at a time of economic anxiety.
To tap into that opportunity, though, we’re going to have to educate a  new generation of problem solvers–scientists, engineers, starry-eyed  techies. So in a selfless sacrifice of my vanity, I offer the following  challenge: When I look back on education in another ten years, I want to  feel like I’ve aged a century.
(With special thanks to George Zaidan for his help during the summit.)
 
No comments:
Post a Comment